Former BET President and founder Bob Johnson is an asshole and hypocrite. Lemme not pull punches, be politically correct, beat around the bushes or try to impress high brow readers who feel I should be less crass and gentler with my words so I can appeal to their sensibilities. It’s 2008 and unfortunately being nice and proper doesn’t quite get the message across, especially when it comes to Bob Johnson and his recent disparaging remarks about presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama.

For those who don’t know what I’m talking about, I’m referring to Johnson getting on stage to introduce Senator Hillary Clinton at a rally and expressing outrage about Obama’s past. He said; “Barack Obama was doing something in the neighborhood. I won’t say what he was doing, but he said it in his book.”

It was a cheap shot referencing Obama’s drug use when he was a young man. This was an activity that Obama freely admitted to in his memoirs ‘Dreams from My Father’ and on some level I can see it being fair game, but coming from a guy like Johnson, that’s like former President Bill Clinton giving marital advice to Hallie Berry’s former husband admitted sex addict Eric Bonet. I heard Johnson make these remarks and I was like ‘Negroe go back into your cave, please sit down and leave the politics to someone else’.

I keep asking myself, where does Johnson get off slamming Obama about the wrongs of drug use when he piloted one of the largest media institutions [BET] that provided a worldwide platform that for the most part glorified and legitimized the lifestyles of those who not only used drugs but also sold them. In all the years we’ve known of ‘billionaire Bob Johnson we have not seen him get on any stage and diss former drug dealers like Jay-Z, 50 Cent, Rick Ross or any number of artists whose videos he would routinely play coupled with sit down interviews conducted by fawning hosts who never ever challenged these artists for resurrecting a ‘criminal’ lifestyle in both their songs and videos they supposedly left behind.

The Bob Johnson we know, has never gone out of his way to publicly smash on artists who like Mary J Blige or Fergie who admitted to using drugs in the past and have since gotten their lives together and moved onward and upward. If anything, the former head of BET could be seen publicly praising them while courting them to appear at his award shows or Spring Bling concerts.

Johnson certainly never came out swinging on admitted drug abusing artists like Whitney Houston, Bobby Brown, Flava Flav or DMX who all had reality shows either on BET or the one of the other stations within the Viacom network where he had influence as a VP.

One would think a guy of Johnson’s new found ‘high moral character’ would’ve been smashing on drug use and drug peddling a long time ago. Could you imagine what sort of shockwaves would’ve been sent around the world if Johnson even as a retired media mogul had spoke out and said;  ’No Bobby! No Whitney! We won’t give them a reality show until those two get themselves healed and free of drugs’? Can you imagine if he insisted the DMX show ‘Soul of a Man‘ was centered around him getting over cocaine addiction?

Imagine the shockwaves if Johnson said; “Hell no Jigga we ain’t supporting your album ‘American Gangster‘ cause you highlighting the sordid lifestyle of heroin dealers like Frank Lucas and we are against that type of behavior? Could you imagine if Johnson found his nuts when at the helm of BET and shut down any and all videos from artists who had ‘dirty pasts’ that they were trying to exploit?

Sadly the Bob Johnson we know, has seemingly had no problem in making billions from highlighting the drug dealing, drug using lifestyle. Adding to this disappointment is the fact that this proud African American billionaire did things like remove programming that would make us question and shun such questionable behavior. It was on Johnson’s watch that BET got rid of great award winning shows like Teen Summit. It was on Johnson’s watch that we saw incredible commentators like Tavis Smiley and Ed Gordon disappear. It was on Johnson’s watch we saw the BET nightly news shrink and then became a non existent. These shows were shut down in spite the objections ranging from scholars like Dr. Cornel West to the 8 major Black fraternities and sororities to more recently church groups leading the Enough is Enough campaign. It was on Johnson’s watch that many in the community were up in arms protesting BET when they had that Step-N-Fetcher like cartoon called Cita’s World. Y’all remember that one right?

As I’m penning this article, I’m vividly recalling Johnson arrogantly responding to critics on a widely televised ‘townhall’ where he was confronted for firing Tavis Smiley, Johnson said that BET stands for ‘Black Entertainment‘ and he is in the business to entertain the masses and that he was not obligated to provide news programming. Who knows, maybe Johnson was trying to be ‘entertaining’ when he made is divisive remarks about Obama.

How is it that Johnson found the courage to stand up against Obama but was mealy mouthed against the artists with questionable pasts that he highlighted on his network who in turn became the face and MIS-perception of all African Americans to the rest of the world? Many of us who are not celebrities and have traveled overseas know the pain we’ve endured of having to explain to fascinated yet misguided individuals in far off lands that we are nothing like the characters and depicted in the videos shown on BET? I know I’ve had my share of conversations where I had to put things in proper context in places ranging from Barcelona to Scotland to Beirut where BET specifically was cited as the referencing point.

Instead, of being a champion for our people who could use his resources and influence to change widely held, worldwide misperceptions and stereotypes of us, he opted to become something more foul then any drug dealer. He became a propagandist of the worse kind. Instead of hustlin’ crack, Johnson hustled Black pathologies, distorted images and misinformation under the banner of Black culture which has resulted in many believing we are part and parcel to the unchallenged buffoonery he allowed highlighted. Instead of celebrating Obama for overcoming the odds including the scorch of drugs to possibly become the next president of the United States, this ‘negroe’ Bob Johnson wants to act like a lap dog for Hillary Clinton and bash on him all while being a media drug peddler of sorts who is in a big way responsible for normalizing drug culture.

And please don’t get me wrong, I am in no way saying Obama is not above criticism. I have lots of critiques that I can launch at him. For the record, I am not the biggest Obama fan. He gives great speeches and has lots of charisma There’s no deny the energy he brings to mainstream political discussion, but from where I sit his politics don’t go quite go far enough. I want Obama to be the type of politician to have been on the ground front and center leading the masses when we went to protest in Jena. Instead all I got was a prèss release.

I want Obama to have been the politician who is bold and assertive and uncompromising to the point that he would speak out on behalf of the SF8 or the Puerto Rican activists who are being jammed up by the Feds. I want Obama to be the type of guy who is smashing hard on police brutality and this current wave of gentrification. But when I argue with my fellow colleagues like writers Adisa Banjoko or Eric K Arnold, our spirited debates center around Obama’s position on issues.

Even the big debate between rap stars Rhymefest (Obama supporter) and Lupe Fiasco (Hillary supporter) has centered around the politics of the candidates. Nobody is brow beating Obama for having used drugs in the past. The Obama we know and see today is clean, smart and razor sharp and we don’t see him coddling and being a big enabler to drug culture the way that billionaire Bob Johnson has been over all those years. He made his billions by pimping drug culture on his network to the fullest.

The biggest challenge that all of us as African Americans have is because Johnson had made some significant economic accomplishments he led many into believing what he was doing as the head of a multi-billion dollar conglomerate like BET was building upon past freedom struggles waged by the likes of Dr Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, the Black Panthers and others.

The sad irony to all this is that if King and X were still alive waging battles against oppression, they would probably be excluded from the day to day banter of BET. We barely see or hear about these past leaders on the station today. What was the last in-depth discussion you saw or heard on BET under Johnson’s reign about King beyond I have a Dream speech? What’s the last insightful story you saw on Malcolm X?

If you listened to Dr. King’s thoughts on media then you know one thing, that BET and the foolishness its put out in the name of our people would’ve been in stark opposition to where King stood in terms of using media as a tool to uplift and inform the community. Like I said Martin and Malcolm would never be on BET aside from a few documentary clips and sound bites if they were around today. If you don’t believe me and think this is far fetched lets take a short trip down memory lane.

Those of us who a re old enough to recall, when BET first came out it held a lot of promise and became a source of pride. It promised to fill the void and become a much needed answer to MTV which started out refusing to air videos from Black artists. Eventually Michael Jackson, Run DMC and later Yo MTV Raps knocked down some of those doors, but BET started off promising to be our uncompromised mouthpiece.

I recall in the late 80s as the cable industry expanded, BET was not included on many of the cable systems and there were spirited campaigns to get them on. It was young 20 something year old activists who were then part of what I would call the Public Enemy/ Afrocentric generation that took to heart some of the promises made by Bob Johnson who at that time called upon people to stand up for BET and demand it be included as a cable channel. BET’s exclusion from local cable systems was seen as yet another example of how prevalent racism was in this country. Many of us were coming out of the tailspin of the crack era and as Hip Hop’s Golden Age kicked in many eagerly sought to fight the power. Getting BET on cable was one such fight.

Here in the Bay Area it was rap activists like artist Chill E.B. who worked tirelessly, organizing letter writing campaigns and call ins to get BET on cable systems outside of Oakland in neighboring cities like Concord, Fremont and other areas it was absent. I recall doing radio shows and even having someone from BET (it may have even been Johnson himself, I have to check my tape archives) come on the air to talk about the importance of all of us pulling together to help insure that BET got a fair shot. I recall giving out phone numbers to the offending cable outlets and encouraging listeners to stand up for BET. Years later many of the activists who spearheaded the fight to get BET on for the masses can’t get on BET themselves to share and inform viewers of on going struggles in our community. For example, I know Chill EB who is a war vet and has spoken out against the war and has even done songs and videos about the topic never has been invited to sit on the 106 & Park couch.

It’s ironic that Obama who at 40 something would’ve been part of that Public Enemy/ Afrocentric generation that initially rallied for causes like getting BET on cable systems now finds himself being criticized by a guy like Bob Johnson. How quickly they turn. But I guess we shouldn’t be surprised shiesty people rarely change their stripes. My boy and fellow writer, Jelani Cobb raised an important question in his recent article on this topic for the Washington Post which was; ‘What were the Clintons thinking when they got Johnson to stomp for them?’. She might as well gotten Rupert Murdoch or Bill O’Reilly to stomp for her. That’s like me running for office and getting a gestapo like guy like Rudy Giuliani to stomp on my behalf-its not a good look and brings into question Senator Clinton’s clear lapse in judgement. All she had to do was look at the number of protests launched against BET in the past few years for their degrading images of women. That should’ve been a clear enough message. In other words if Hillary thinks so little of Black people that she went and dug up a cat likes Bob Johnson then I’m gonna have to close the book on her and bounce the other way and roll with Obama, Cynthia Mckinney, Jared Ball, Dennis Kucinich -anybody but her.

By Glen Ford, In These Times

http://www.alternet.org/story/41361/

“It’s bigger!” roared T.J. Crawford. “It’s bigger!” the crowd shouted
back, in traditional call-and-response fashion. “It’s bigger than hip
hop!”

Crawford, chairman of the National Hip Hop Political Convention
(NHHPC), deployed the hook of a song by hip hop’s iconic “conscious”
group, dead prez, to bring home the point: Members of what marketers
have labeled the “hip-hop generation” are concerned with much more than
just nodding their heads to the beat. Politics is more important –
bigger! — than music for activists who have felt swept aside and
demobilized by black elders whose outlook was forged in the crucible of
civil rights organizing. These young crews, along with the elders who
hang with them on political issues, aim to seize leadership of what’s
left of the movement — although they’re not quite sure how to do it.

Hip-hop politics emerged from the musical movement launched in the
South Bronx in the late ’70s — itself a reaction to the unfinished
business, the arrested development, of black politics. The late-’60s
demise of segregation allowed black professionals to escape the inner
city, to climb corporate ladders and achieve elected offices. However,
budding corporate executives and elected officials have little use for
mass movements, except on election days or when corporate careers are
threatened by institutional racism. As a class, these “New Negroes”
left the rest of the African American population still locked in the
ghetto, to their own devices.

“The birth of hip hop, the environment, grew out of the early ’70s,
police brutality, poverty, unemployment — all these social ills that
were affecting marginalized and oppressed people,” says Angelica
Salazar, an ethnic studies major at University of California, Berkeley,
and an activist in the Coalition for Black-Brown Unity and the NHHPC
movement. “One of the reasons that hip hop has been so globally
successful — so critical in reaching our people and crossing borders
– is that every marginalized people who have been oppressed and put
into ‘reservations’ can relate to that experience. You are trying to
recreate what was stolen from you.”

Looking to put black politics back on track, 4,000 people from across
the nation, mostly but not entirely African American, flocked to
multiple venues on Chicago’s South Side for the convention. They hoped
to build on the work of the first NHHPC, which took place in Newark,
New Jersey in 2004.

The Chicago affair, like its Newark predecessor, strained to tackle the
two fundamental questions that are constantly posed to younger blacks:
Is there a generational divide among African American activists, or are
the fissures more complicated? And how can the cultural force of hip
hop be directed to affect social change?

The old school

Despite the gains that African Americans have made since segregation,
social change is still very much needed. But a mass black movement has
floundered. According to NAACP chairman Julian Bond, there were 10,000
separate anti-racist actions in the year 1963 alone. In the current
era, one is hard-pressed to name a significant anti-racist
demonstration in any given year.

While the older generation of civil rights activists is marching on,
they’re no longer at the front of the action. Last year, 20,000 braved
Atlanta’s August heat to demand reauthorization of the Voting Rights
Act in a march organized by the NAACP, the Southern Christian
Leadership Conference, Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, black churches and civic
groups, and a strong union contingent. But considerably less than half
the participants could reasonably be called youthful. “It was a
significantly older crowd,” says Bruce Dixon, Atlanta-based editor of
BlackCommentator.com (of which I am executive editor) and longtime
activist. “Back in the days when a real movement existed, the crowd
would have been nine-tenths youth.”

On the speakers’ platform, among a cast that included Rev. Jesse
Jackson, Harry Belafonte, and U.S. Reps. John Lewis (D-Ga.) and Maxine
Waters (D-Calif.), the youngest notables were singer Stevie Wonder, age
55, and TV’s Judge Greg Mathis, 45.

Similar demographics dominated the throng that attended the Millions
More rally on Washington’s Capitol Mall in October 2005. The seemingly
endless list of speakers, although representing virtually every
political tendency in Black America, included very few below age 50 –
and these tended to be entertainers. Despite the presence of a vocal
Howard University contingent, the atmosphere was more picnic-like than
militant — a Saturday gathering of mainly middle-aged folks.

Clearly, black movement politics has entered the geriatric stage — if,
indeed, anything worthy of the term “movement” still exists.

The NAACP’s youth and college councils number about 100,000 people –
one-fifth of the claimed half-million overall membership of the only
real mass organization in Black America. The Southern Christian
Leadership Conference is no longer a mass organization, and has nothing
like the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (defunct since 1970)
under its umbrella. The National Urban League has never been a mass
grouping. Operation PUSH/Rainbow Coalition is Rev. Jackson’s vehicle,
and functions as he wishes. PUSH has not developed an independent youth
group, or anything else independent of Rev. Jackson.

All too often, critics dismiss the lack of younger activists at the
podium as a function of a black “generational divide.” Could it be that
simple?

Divided we fall

Not according to Rev. Lennox Yearwood, the 36-year-old head of the
D.C.-based Hip Hop Caucus. Instead of a generational schism, he sees a
“cultural and geographic divide” that developed after the death of Jim
Crow provided an opening for spatial and economic mobility to those
blacks positioned to take advantage of it.

Traditional black organizations were most concerned with servicing the
goals of these aspiring populations, according to Rev. Yearwood. “The
church and other institutions have gone from being usable institutions
for the community to being institutionalized” — upholding rather that
rattling the status quo. In contrast, he says, “Hip hop emerges out of
the Black Power Movement, as a voice for the urban community.”

Yearwood has been involved in an extraordinary range of political
activities under the hip-hop umbrella, from Russell Simmons’ Hip-Hop
Summit Action Network to the AFL-CIO-affiliated Hip Hop Voices to Hip
Hop U.N., “a coalition of all the hip-hop political organizations
throughout the world.” His organization describes itself as “a national
and international coalition of hip hop, pop-culture, social and
political organizations, community-based organizations, youth
leadership organizations, and individuals who believe in the collective
power of persons born after 1964.”

In Jersey City, N.J., 25-year-old Hassan Salaam helps public school
kids with their homework and teaches chess to youngsters through a
National Urban League program. He’s also a hip-hop activist with the
Grassroots Artist Movement, which secures healthcare services for
artists. Salaam is confident that his cadre of artists is in tune with
the black political/cultural continuum.

“There’s no difference to me,” says Salaam, who equates Grandmaster
Flash’s classic “The Message” with the works of Duke Ellington and John
Coltrane. “Within hip hop, we’re talking about the same things the
older people talk about.”

“There is a generational divide, but it’s not the primary problem,”
agrees Troy Nkrumah. A lawyer under 30, he assists political prisoners
and radical youth organizations in Las Vegas, after doing similar work
in the San Francisco Bay area. From Nkrumah’s perspective, it is the
political timidity of established black leaders that has led to the
current generational tensions. “The civil rights folks got into
comfortable positions,” said Nkrumah. “In their minds, they thought
they were still down with the movement, but they resisted the
radicalism of the young.”

If the cutoff date for the hip-hop generation is a birthday in 1964,
then a majority of black people now belong to it, Nkrumah told me. “Hip
hop grows every year,” he continues. “Until it dies out, it will grow.
Hip hop is not just music, dancing, graffiti — it’s activism.”

Angela Woodson, the 36-year-old co-chair of the Newark convention,
presents a starker view of the youth cultural scene. “There are three
worlds of hip hop. There’s the corporate world, the political world –
and the stupid world.”

That “stupid world” grew out of the gangsta rap genre that corporate
record labels have been pushing since the early ’90s. The
corporatization and segmentation of black music has been crucial in
driving a wedge between generations.

“Me and my parents listened to the same radio station: WBLS-FM — that
was the campfire,” says New York native and Bay Area radio personality
Davey D, who is not yet 40. “Now the same company uses one station to
target one age group, another station to target the other. If you look
at the types of venues where wisdom was dispersed, you don’t have
elders talking to younger people.”

This generation lives in a different media world than their elders –
one stripped of relevance. The content of corporate-owned stations is
dumbed down and apolitical. During the mass demonstrations for
immigrant rights in Los Angeles, KKBT-FM (”The Beat”) completely
ignored one million people in the streets. “It was similar to the
Million Man March right on their doorstep, yet to KKBT and its
listeners, it didn’t exist,” says Davey D.

So, culture, class issues, consumerism and varying degrees of
complacency all divide African Americans, as much if not more than
generational differences.

In fact, to reduce the fragmentation of black politics into a
generation gap is to play into the hands of the right. Republicans have
shown that it can play the youth game as well as the left — better,
because they have more money.

Take the victory of Newark’s new African-American mayor, Cory Booker,
who was an obscure, 33-year-old, one-term Newark city councilman when
he starred at a power luncheon at the Manhattan Institute, the
right-wing outfit that specializes in media influence, in 2000. Booker
had earlier hooked up with the Bradley and Walton Family (Wal-Mart)
Foundations, to become a director of their political invention, the
Black Alliance for Educational Options (BAEO) — a pro-school vouchers
group. After losing the 2002 election, Booker raised $6.1 million for
another run, garnering universal corporate media endorsements. He based
his campaign on the need for “new blood” and criticisms of the “tired
civil-rights generation.”

All together now

Seeking change, young and old came together at both the 2004 NHHPC and
the one that took place this year in Chicago’s historic Bronzeville
neighborhood.

The oldest speaker at the first day’s Intergenerational Dialogue,
Illinois Secretary of Human Services Dr. Carol Adams, was possibly the
most militant of “The Movement Continues” panel participants. “To think
that we have to begin our revolution again every generation is sad,
indeed,” said the sixtyish black civil servant. The crowd exploded in
cheers.

NHHPC activists were quick to distinguish themselves from the rich
entrepreneurs and poseurs who claim to be the voice of a younger
generation.

“I don’t know that I need Fat Joe [an Afro-Puerto Rican/Bronx rapper]
to be the next black leader, the next Malcolm X,” said Cedric Shine, a
recent graduate from Temple University who works for the Center for
American Progress, a liberal think tank in Washington, D.C. “I don’t
think me and P-Diddy are going to have similar goals in life.”

Twenty-seven-year-old Adrienne Marie Brown was a key player in the 2004
NHHPC as well as an operative in that year’s Democratic election
campaign. Brown trained voter organizations and created voter guides in
Ohio, and also worked through the League of Pissed Off Voters, whose
“mission is to engage pissed off 17 to 35-year-olds in the democratic
process to build a progressive governing majority in our lifetime.”

Brown believes the younger black demographics are grouped in three
political sections: youth activists in the civil rights movement, a
hip-hop movement heavily influenced by “angry” black music, and the
young middle class.

Young civil rights activists working in traditional organizations are
blocked from taking power by an entrenched leadership, says Brown. The
group she calls the “young middle class” are comfortable and
complacent. “Most black middle-class young people — a huge arena –
don’t identify as hip hop or as civil rights. They just want to boogie.
They don’t want to mess anything up.” Black leadership, for this
cohort, is whatever power and media say it is. “They look at black
leadership and see people like Condoleezza Rice. We in the hip-hop
movement don’t see Condoleezza Rice as evidence of progress,” Brown
says.

Brown is now executive director of the Ruckus Society, which “provides
environmental, human rights, and social justice organizers with the
tools, training, and support needed to achieve their goals.” Her
mission? To spark a mass movement.

Limitations in the movement

But can hip-hop politics provide a new way in the face of corporatization and complacency? Reviews are mixed.

Some were not happy with the organizers of this year’s NHHPC. The 2004
Newark document set forth practical, progressive positions on
education, economic justice, criminal justice, health and wellness, and
human rights, but “somehow, in 2004, gender issues were not on the
agenda,” said Nkrumah, the Las Vegas-based human rights lawyer.
Organizers in Chicago rushed to gather suggestions for positions on
“womanism,” the environment, gentrification, media, and a broader
stance on “all forms of economic oppression, local or global.”

However, it remained unclear what force the old or newly-adopted items
would have since, as 2004 organizer Rosa Clemente pointed out, “We have
not decided what type of organization we want to be.” She is not
optimistic that her cohort can repair the damage that has been done.
“There was a complete failure of black leadership, and there’s only so
much the hip-hop generation can do.”

NHHPC chairman Crawford conceded the amorphous nature of the
organization — the undefined relationships between the national
steering committee, the local organizing committees, and the 14
separate organizations to which many of the key organizers belong.
“This agenda expresses the political ambition of the hip-hop
community,” says Crawford.

A few attendees offered innovative approaches. Nimco Ahmad, an
organizer from Milwaukee who was among the ‘04 convention leadership,
uses sophisticated surveys to identify supporters of progressive
candidates based on previous voting patterns. Volunteers are developed
from these areas, and then further outreach work is conducted among
groups of “disenfranchised communities” that tend to vote less
frequently. “Those are your new base,” says Ahmad.

Campaign Against Violence organizer C.J. Jenkins uses similar
techniques to stop inner-city violence. “First, we create a grid
showing the most violent neighborhoods” says Jenkins. Then they elicit
neighborhood opinions about the sources of violence, and designate
block captains to keep watch on local activities. Jenkins urged
would-be organizers to “set up tables at barber shops and nightclubs.
Hit every community event that you can. Work with black radio and print
media to achieve high visibility. The people must know who you are, and
that you are with and among them.”

Listening to such speakers, it becomes plain that little has changed
over the decades except that the rightist and racist enemy has
regrouped and become more powerful, while progressive forces have often
failed to do the basics of political organizing.

The fragmentation of black politics spells disaster, not just for
African Americans, but for progressives of all hues. Last year, the Bay
Area Center for Voting Research found that the nation’s most “liberal”
cities by voting patterns are also the blackest. The “left” lives in
Detroit, Gary, Washington D.C., Oakland, Newark — all the major
African-American urban centers.

The hip-hop activists who have been set in motion are a conscious
extension of the movement that came before. Their fate is to work on
the unfinished business of the previous struggle — plus the mounting
threats of gentrification, mass black incarceration and raging
imperialism. It’s a task that is indeed “bigger than hip hop.”

This story was produced under the George Washington Williams Fellowship, a program of the Independent Press Association.

© 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.